On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:37:42PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: > oops... makes sense to me! > I'll get to that tomorrow.
done as a historical note: i think that originally, CSWgzip did not depend on common, for just this reason. Guess I forgot that :-/ (I'm gzip maintainer. har har) The other option would be to make gzip not depend on it any more. But either way, there isnt significant reason to have CSWcommon gzipped, given the size. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
