Le 08.04.2009 00:11, Peter Bonivart a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Mike Watters<[email protected]> wrote:
sorry, I miss read the post. You can override the variable(s)
in the package set GARVERSION as x.x and have
SPKG_VERSION be YYYYMMDD (as package build date)
But why would we fake the upstream version and for how long should we
keep doing that? Some packages, like my geodb and possibly pca,
doesn't have versions at all so we assign something like YYMMDD to it
but in this case the end users would be confused, right?
This would also be really ugly:
20090408,REV=2009.04.08_rev=1.0
I would also prefer to follow the upstream version numbering for the
package, that seems closer to the standard
http://www.opencsw.org/standards/build .
Why pkgutil and pkg-get don't have the same way to compare package
versions ? It wasn't supposed to be standard ?
Yann
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
