On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:52:19PM +0200, Trygve Laugst??l wrote: > Philip Brown wrote: >> Perhaps you could pick a different title for the page, and possible url, >> though? >> >> "packagedocs" perhaps? > > I tried to think of a better name, but I couldn't really find a name I > liked more so I just went with what already was there.
but what was there, does not suit the purpose :-/ The usage conflicts with the core site's http://www.opencsw.org/packages To my mind, I think that for http://XXXX.opencsw.org/NAMEHERE that "NAMEHERE", should ideally be somewhat unique across the organization, reguardless of which specific sub-site it is currently hosted it. > One thing I've been thinking about is creating documentation for users > and (future) maintainers. If I where to take over a package I would > appreciate some documentation on how to test the package. > > How about creating two tags: > * user-doc: documentation for users (basically what those pages are today) > * maintainer-doc: documentation for maintainers, which would include > tricks to build the package and how to test it. makes sense. ideally, they would somehow automatically have a button or link to toggle between userlevel and maintainer level docs. (not the same page; just that each page links to its counterpart)
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
