Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri May 08 17:23:22 -0400 2009: > do you remember the specifics of WHY? > i have forgotten.
You didn't think it was hurting anything to keep it as is. My view is that since it's dead upstream and our release is behind their last security release it should be dropped...I don't even think upping to the last 4.4.9 release is a reasonable time investment at this point. > > If I changed my argument to 'remove it from the catalog, but > > leave it on the mirrors' would change your opinion Phil? > > That makes no sense. > if we keep it, it stays in the catalog. I was just trying to provide a way for people that want it (for whatever reason) to be able to easily grab it without it being a supported package with the csw tool chain. Drop it is my official stance. > its worth discussing what should be /opt/csw/bin/php though. > > I am in favour of it being php5. That's my vote, too. I don't even think this is a real question at this point. > it doesnt look like there are any dependancies of OURS that use it. > However, it would need to be carefully announced ahead of time to users. Agreed. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
