Philip Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 06:35:28PM +0200, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i packaged mailx that was formerly known as nail (CSWnail). Now how >> would we go about obsoleting CSWnail? Just drop it from the catalog, let >> CSWnail become an empty package that pulls in CSWmailx and somehow >> deletes CSWnail, or is there another preferred (proven) way of doing >> things like this? > > > ugh. is the binary really called "mailx"? that would be very lame. > I think it might actually be nice to keep it as called "nail" :-}
Yep, "nail has been integrated into the Heirloom project as mailx" [1] and the binary is called mailx. I could add a symlink called nail that points to mailx. Thoughts? Sebastian [1] http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/mailx.html _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
