On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:30:55PM -0400, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 18 13:35:16 -0400 2009: > > anything in /etc, is by definition, NOT global :-} "global/shared" > > stuff, is under /opt/csw. Whether that be because it is NFS-shared, > > or lofs-shared across zones. > > Ok, but if we're already in the position of straddling shared vs > non-shared, which presumably sees the nfs/zones people need to make > arrangements for sharing the things living in /etc already, why not go > all the way?
you make this "go all the way" statement multiple times, but I dont understand what you mean by it. So I will condense and rephrase what i was saying previously: MOST configs, probably belong in /etc/opt/csw. However, there are a few configs, that rarely change, and are presumed to be standardized site-wide. For those things, there is no harm(and sometimes, an actual benefit) in having the configs live in /opt/csw/etc. Things like xpdf configs, and so on, that almost never change, and are presumed normally identical across all machines at a site. .......... Furthermore, in the even that a site administrator decides it is important to hack a local override for the config file, our packages can smoothly and easily handle it, if deployed in a clean manner. if /opt/csw/etc/someglobal.conf is usually copied in via our cswcpsampleconf class action, it will only be copied in or updated, if the site has not created something of their own there. So, if the site admin replaced it, with /opt/csw/etc/someglobal.conf -> /etc/opt/csw/someglobal.conf then that symlink would be left along, and what is normally a globally shared config file, becomes a machine-local config file, for that site only. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
