Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Dagobert Michelsen<[email protected]> wrote: >> Why? Usually it is no different packaging for Solaris 9 than for >> Solaris 8. Why drop Solaris 8 without the need? If there is *any* >> problem on Solaris 8 it is of course ok to just release for Solaris 9. > > We still need to rephrase the claim that Solaris 8 is fully supported > by Sun. Maybe just remove the part about Sun..? > > "...provide quality downloadable binary packages for Sun Solaris 8, 9 > and 10, both Sparc and x86."
We just agreed on a rephrasing which seems alright: "versions 9 and 10 of Sun Solaris (and 8, when possible) for both Sparc and x86." What's the issue with that? -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
