"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Philip Brown<[email protected]> wrote: >> having a big source code repository for packaging type stuff is useful, >> becuase it puts things "all in one place", that otherwise, would not have a >> home. Otherwise, you'd have some in one persons' home directory, and some >> in another person's home directory. >> >> In contrast, for web work on the www.opencsw.org main webserver, >> All the "code" is already "all in one place": in the web server filesystem. >> >> If you are one of the rare people who has chosen to actually do work on the >> web coding, then you already know exactly where to look. and you can >> already see everyone else's webcode too. its all quite "open" and organized >> already. > > Do other people agree with the above? (That it's the web site source > code is open and organized already.)
- it's open in the sense that if you have access to the hosting system you can read the source - its organization is intrinsic - the code is not part of a project manageable by a team, the way that the projects that we package are - there is no documentation for this or other infrastructure of the OpenCSW project Is there opportunity to change this situation? I think that an answer would give also a measure of the OpenCSW politics. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
