Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Jul 24 14:53:17 -0400 2009: > > After a few revisions of the patch, it was seemingly dropped. > > My recollection was that you, Dago, and I, discussed a different way of > doing things; you agreed to do it... but then did not finish the method we > discussed.
I knocked out a patch to checkpkg that allowed the calls from GAR to say -i $pkg,$pkg2, or some such. It then skipped validating those dependencies and GAR presumably passed in the set of packages being built currently. That was rejected. I submitted a second patch that let it evaluate multiple packages at the same time, remembering missing libraries/dependencies and checking again at the end after checking the rest of the packages. I'd have to dig it out, but afaik, there wasn't anything wrong with this patch, it just wasn't applied. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
