On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Sebastian Kayser<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > just wrote my first python module build description and noticed that > most of the few python modules in our catalog follow a catalog name > naming scheme of > > py<modulename> > > With regards to user experience and consistency could we change the > default/standard to be more like the perl modules which have > pm_<modulename>? So for python modules this would be: > > py_<modulename>
A question: Suppose the project's name is "pyfoo". (Like: http://pyyaml.org/) If we had py_projectname, it would end up being py_pyyaml. It looks a bit stupid. On the other hand, creating py_yaml makes the catalog name not containing the project name. If I tried doing pkg-get -a <projectname>, I wouldn't find the package. Which do you think is better? Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
