Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote on 28.08.2009 13:09: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Peter FELECAN<[email protected]> wrote: >> "Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Dagobert Michelsen<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Yes: >>>> <https://www.ohloh.net/p/GAR/enlistments> >>> Why don't we have two enlistments (opencsw + gar) and only one project >>> at ohloh? It's only one project after all. Just because two >>> repositories are used, doesn't make it two projects. Sebastian, what >>> do you think about adding the gar repository enlistment to the >>> opencsw ohloh project? >> IMHO there are 2 projects, certainly related but 2 in number. > > GAR might be considered a separate software project, but the builds > themselves are code using GAR, they aren't GAR itself. Don't the > builds seem belong to the OpenCSW project rather than GAR?
I felt almost the same, Dago has/had reasons for not mixing the sf.net projects (on ohloh). Maybe we can call a vote ;) +1 *SCNR* Kidding aside, I would be in favor of at least adding the gar.sf.net pkg/ subtree to the OpenCSW ohloh project - most of the CSW work a maintainer does is going on there. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
