Peter FELECAN wrote:
"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes:

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Peter FELECAN<[email protected]> wrote:
"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes:

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Peter FELECAN<[email protected]> wrote:
"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes:

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Dagobert Michelsen<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes:
 <https://www.ohloh.net/p/GAR/enlistments>
Why don't we have two enlistments (opencsw + gar) and only one project
at ohloh? It's only one project after all. Just because two
repositories are used, doesn't make it two projects. Sebastian, what
do you think about adding the gar repository enlistment  to the
opencsw ohloh project?
IMHO there are 2 projects, certainly related but 2 in number.
GAR might be considered a separate software project, but the builds
themselves are code using GAR, they aren't GAR itself. Don't the
builds seem belong to the OpenCSW project rather than GAR?
Nope. gar is only one of the mechanisms used to build packages. not all
builds use gar. all this is an instance of the hammer syndrome.
Are you seriously saying that the builds, the code that is used to
describe how to build OpenCSW packages, are not part of the OpenCSW
project? If not that, then what code is?

You misread my message: what I'm saying is that gar is not opencsw,
although some packages are built with gar. Saying that gar is opencsw is
like saying that the autotools, make and other utilities used to build
packages are opencsw. I'm speaking not only to warm up the discussion
but also to avoid unnecessary reductionism.

I think that you are putting way too much into this.

GAR is written by and for OpenCSW [1], so I think it is quite correct to say that "gar is a part of OpenCSW". What is not correct is to say that "OpenCSW is a part of GAR". OpenCSW is more than that, GAR is only a supporting tool for us.

Adding GAR to the OpenCSW project on ohloh is not part of a crusade to force any of you to use GAR.

[1]: yes, it was originally based on GOMES GAR, but we (Dago) has re-written so much of it that we can at least almost call it our own.

--
Trygve
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Reply via email to