On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> every package that is "current"ly being distributed, needs to actually WORK. >> for so long as CSWbar is present, CSWlibfoo must ensure that it does >> not break, by supplying the older library that CSWbar requires. > > That's clear. What I had in mind is: how do we prevent our libraries > from growing indefinitely in size due to stale dependent packages?
It's worked pretty well for 6 years now. All the questions you are asking, are dealt with on a case-by-base basis. There really isnt a need to spell out every single possible contingency. [and there's a need to NOT spell it out.. documents that are too long, get ignored.] Bottom line is, progress happens by people willing to do work. not by documenting things to the Nth degree. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
