On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 06.10.2009 um 17:55 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> >> I have two issues regarding modulations. One is a feature request. >> Suppose I have two extra modulators, foo and bar. If each has two >> values, I end up with four... um... modulations. The name for each >> modulation is foomod-foovar-barmod-barval. If I want to add my own >> merge rules, I need to enter: >> >> MERGE_foomod-fooval1-barmod-barval1 = ... >> MERGE_foomod-fooval1-barmod-barval2 = ... >> MERGE_foomod-fooval2-barmod-barval1 = ... >> MERGE_foomod-fooval2-barmod-barval2 = ... >> >> Suppose I have a merge rule that applies to both values of barmod. I >> would like then to say: >> >> MERGE_foomod-fooval1 = one thing >> MERGE_foomod-fooval2 = some other thing >> >> The desired effect is that "one thing" is included in both barval1 and >> barval2 modulations. Is it doable? > > Sure. But I don't see a usecase for this. Usually you take all from > barval1 and only some specific things with renames from barval2. > Additionally, the modulators grow long with the default ISA modulation > and maybe the added version modulator. Some kind of sane defaults > can make this much easier to use. > Can I have a look at your Makefile?
Here's my minimal example: https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/examples/modulations/branches/minimal-version-modulation/Makefile > But before I make more changes to GAR I would like to deploy v2-pbuild > for general use, so please everyone test! Okay, I'm going to start using it with the packages I'm currently working on. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
