On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > yes that is exactly what we used to do. we used to have a "quarterly > freeze" time.
That freeze also affected unstable for some reason. We were basically not being able to release anything for weeks. If were going to revive this corpse we should still be able to release to current. Also, we should ask ourselves what's the most important thing for the users? Is it really stability which we hardly can guarantee or is it just a frozen state? Many sync our mirrors from time to time with no interest in having the latest and greatest, most important to them is that every machine gets the same version. We're a small organization and to put all the work James did onto someone else, even if shared by a few, is not time well spent in my opinion. We should rethink this, not just start it up again. It died for a reason. -- /peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
