On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a question, mostly to Phil, about one shared object file in > CSWnspr. Here's the prototype bit: > > d none /opt/csw/lib/nspr/cpu 0755 root bin > d none /opt/csw/lib/nspr/cpu/sparcv8plus 0755 root bin > f none /opt/csw/lib/nspr/cpu/sparcv8plus/libnspr_flt4.so 0755 root bin > > It looks like nspr builds one V8+ shared library on purpose. It puts > it in a separate directory. All other shared libraries are V8. > Normally, packages with V8+ binaries are rejected. In this case, > there's a clearly separate V8+ binary, which looks optional to me. > Would it be a problem to include it in the package? Or should I just > exclude it? >
you absolutely SHOULD include it. looks very clean. There is no global restriction about V8+ binaries. there's just a restriction against them as /opt/csw/bin/executable_here _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
