Hi,
Am 28.11.2009 um 14:31 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Dagobert Michelsen
<[email protected]> wrote:
And, yes, using GAR is the best practice for this. With the
sabbatical
of Mike we have another excellent example why it is a good idea to
have
a central repository with standardized build recipes. It allowed
Maciej to take over sudo in no time.
bad example :-)
I'm not sure what makes you smile. If you want precise language, I
was able to fix a bug in no time, and start maintaining my own
company-internal version of the package. As far as taking over is
concerned, the process has gone over my fuss-making quota.
The failure modes you've given involve local symlink alterations while
failure modes I've pointed out involve plain CSW package updates. If
my new package and the explanation I've given isn't enough, it's too
bad. I'm tired of debating the topic in private.
Hugh? What's going on? Why is the updated sudo not released?
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
