* Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here's the alternatives package for you to test: > > > > http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/alternatives-1.15.5.3,REV=2009.12.10-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz > > > > To address the concern that the executable name is long: it's not > > going to be typed by humans. It will be used by postinstall scripts > > (or class action scripts). > > Then how will humans specify what they want?
What's the concern about the command name being too long when we live in an age of shell auto-completion? As a related question: we port a known utility to our platform (Solaris), why not keep the known name? That's what we do with almost all the other software. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
