On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Sebastian Kayser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Since we ALREADY have a database that keeps track of that sort of >> thing.. the mantis database... and that information MUST be kept >> current there.... it doesn't make sense, from the standpoint of "good >> information management practices" to make another separate database. >> It would require even more synchronization between things. >> Simpler is better. > > Currently I can't just grant every maintainer global maintainer > privileges for easier bug handling in Mantis
err, what? I dont understand why you even bring that up. Maybe you should look again at the mantis database level setup? mantis supports both "global manager" priviledges, and project-specific manager privileges. that's how we do things right now. "proj-specific mananger" == "owner". mantis supports having more than one "proj-specific manager". So there would be no fixes needed to mantis itself. It would need code changes to the package "registration" process,and changes to the "package web page display" code. But both of those things will need changes anyway, if we ever support multiple people "owning" a package. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
