Hi,
Am 19.12.2009 um 01:27 schrieb Ben Walton:
Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Dec 18 17:44:17 -0500
2009:
by that argument, you might say that me naming "pkg-get" as such, and
not "apt-get", was just too confusing, because since the userland
syntax is the same, and it IS a 90% clone of apt-get, I should have
kept the name as apt-get.
The difference being pkg-get is an apt-get workalike. The package
Maciej has put forward is the 'real deal[1].'
While the name used in Debian is long and annoying to type, even with
auto-completion, it's really not something you interact with often, if
at all.
So, my 'vote' is that if we don't do a ground up reimplementation, we
stick with the name from Debian. If somebody wants to invest the time
tailoring a solution to CSW, pick a new name.
<wonders aloud>
Is anyone else out there not making use of auto-completion shell
features? Life feels too short for that! :)
</wonders aloud>
-Ben
[1] It's the identical code/functionality split out from a larger
Debian package.
+1 from me and it is still not released. Could we please get on with
this?
I need this for at least two packages (mutt and especially automake),
both pending release.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
