Sounds interesting. I have no technical implementation suggestions; only a minor quibble about naming:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > One kind of checks I can think of is about testing the prototype. The > GAR interface could look something like this: > > ASSERT_PROTOTYPE_CONTAINS_CSWfoo = $(bindir)/foo > ASSERT_PROTOTYPE_ABSENT_CSWfoo = $(bindir)/sparcv9/foo > ASSERT_PROTOTYPE_ABSENT_CSWfoo-devel = .*\.py > ASSERT_PROTOTYPE_CONTAINS_CSWpy-foo = .*\.py > given the wider intended scope for this, perhaps you might want to call it "ASSERT_PKG_xxxx" rather than "ASSERT_PROTOTYPE_xxx" _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
