Hi Maciej,
Am 03.03.2010 um 20:16 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
Here's a new package, Google command line option parsing for C++
and Python.
* gflags: new package
+ gflags-1.3,REV=2010.03.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
+ gflags-1.3,REV=2010.03.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
Ah... this seems to be another isaexec GAR malfunction :(
1 l none /opt/csw/bin/gflags_completions.sh =/opt/csw/bin/isaexec
1 f none /opt/csw/bin/sparcv8/gflags_completions.sh 0755 root bin
5268 44497 126
6668632
1 f none /opt/csw/bin/sparcv9/gflags_completions.sh 0755 root bin
5268 44497 126
6668663
we need isaexec, on a shellscript? seriously?
Well I suppose there is some theoretical possibility... However, the
two files are identical.
Dago, what do you think about this issue? I think I could work around
it by excluding $(bindir) from the merging phase. However, in the
general case it could be possible that there are some binaries that
you want to be handled by isaexec, plus a shellscript which doesn't
need it.
There are two possibilities:
1. You can set ISAEXEC_FILES manually. It default to all files in
$(bindir), $(sbindir) and $(libexecdir)
2. You can set ISAEXEC_EXCLUDE_FILES to $(bindir)/
gflags_completions.sh or
even %.sh Note the Makefile-wildcard here! On reading this it may be
more consistent to use general regexes here.
Additionally, I now really think we should change the default to merge
only $(libdir) from additional isas and only isaexec on request.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
