2010/4/10 Ben Walton <[email protected]>: > Is the full /var/sadm/install/contents format required?
If the file had the same format, I could use the same parser. > I'd expect > you only need the first and last fields to implement the check. Eg: > File /x/y/z in your package CSWfoort conflicts with CSWoldfoo, or > something. I think that's OK if the file had dummy strings for uninteresting fields. The important fields are: - full path - file type - pkgname > We have this info in the central database, as it's consumed by the > /search/ URL on the website. If we made periodic (weekly?) dumps of > this data available for download/caching[1] by checkpkg, you could > achieve what's required, no? It would be a public[1] URL, so it > wouldn't be tied to the buildfarm... I like the idea. I'll try to sketch something along those lines in the following week. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
