On 9/21/10, Gordon Marler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/21/2010 01:15 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >> On 9/21/10, Gordon Marler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >From site to site, it's never safe to assume that anyone has installed >>> any of the /{usr,opt}/sfw packages. Frankly, I've never actually been >>> to a place that installed them by default. >>> >> ?? >> > While Solaris 10 may require *some* packages that deliver payloads to > /usr/sfw to be installed, wget is not one of them. Across 1400 Solaris > 10 systems I have access to, only 3 or 4 of them have had that > particular package installed.
You seem to be contradicting yourself a bit. You went from "[you shouldnt assume that] any of the /usr/sfw packages are installed", to [some of them can be expected]. But, that being said, I can understand how wget might not be included in a system install. I'm just disagreeing on a solution to the issue of "let's provdide one stop bootstrapping for opencsw". It seems like this issue has been a little misrepresented. We already HAVE "one line bootstrapping" via the pkgutil method. One that is already mentioned on our web site: # pkgadd -d http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/pkgutil-`uname -p`.pkg This doesnt seem complicated to me. A one line cut-n-paste. Easy. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
