No dia 2 de Agosto de 2010 09:04, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> escreveu: > Other topic: documentation. Having both rdoc and ri docs is quite > large, most of the time the documentation is much larger in size > and much, much larger in terms of files. I tend to split it off, > but the standard _doc and -doc suffixes together with the gem > prefix would leave only very little space for the actual gem > name making identification difficult. I tend to increase the > maximum length of package and catalog names for the sake of > consistency.
On the package name length topic, opk recently came across libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0, which yields CSWlibpyglib-2-0-python0, a 24 characters long pkgname. Current restriction in checkpkg is 20 characters for both pkgname and catalogname. Is it something we intend to keep at all times, or is it OK to exceed this default in cases such as this long soname? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
