On 11/5/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <[email protected]> wrote: > No dia 5 de Novembro de 2010 15:45, Philip Brown <[email protected]> > escreveu: >> On 11/5/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <[email protected]> wrote: >>> How about: "build description" or "package build description"? The >>> word "repository" does not contain any interesting information in this >>> context. >> >> >> i disagree. >> It's not a "description". It's a reference to a specific svn-tag, in a >> specific part of a source code tree. > > No, it's not a reference to a subversion tag. It's a reference to a > specific revision of a file in a subversion repository. >
err, what? Existing OPENCSW_REPOSITORY lines in packages, do not refer to a specific directory. They tend to have the form OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/software/tr...@12345 That does not refer to a specific file. If we are planning to make OPENCSW_REPOSITORY visible in our package information webpage, then "description" does not fit that information. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
