* Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 23.11.2010 um 00:00 schrieb Philip Brown: > > On 11/19/10, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 18.11.2010 um 20:45 schrieb Philip Brown: > > > >>> If there's no other feedback in support of the shorter method, then I > >>> guess I'll start working on implementing the longer method come monday > >>> (nov 22nd) > >> > >> Great! > > > > fyi, this is done. > > Um, where is it? There is no link at > http://www.opencsw.org/packages/libtool/ > or is the webpage done by someone else?
It's done by someone else. Anyone aware about the packages/ setup on our www box? Anyone with Wordpress know how? Will look into it unless someone else jumps in. @Ihsan: Just had a look, the web files on the www box are still all owned by William. Could we get a wwwadmin user to which certain people can sudo to? > > and I also took the liberty of back-registering packages released in > > the last 100 days. Thanks. Any problem with simply processing all packages? > > Good thing I like copious output from my registration script... or I > > would have missed that it isnt always "sf.net", but sometimes > > "sourceforge.net" :-/ > > The plain SVN URL is registered in the package. The problem is that > Sourceforge has multiple domains with the same contents, but I guess > these are the only ones. In our repository links we should use SF's canonical domain name (sourceforge.net) as that's what their certificates are issued for, e.g. *.svn.sourceforge.net. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
