Hi, Am 24.11.2010 um 19:07 schrieb Philip Brown: > On 11/24/10, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I dont know about your definition of "high quality packages", but >> "maintainer releases what is 'good enough for them', and no-one else >> looks at it", definately does not fit my definition of it. > > To be clearer: > I want the target that we aim at, to be, > "high quality packages, EVERY TIME we release a package to current". > > Not, "we release packages often. The quality of packages cycles > between low and high, based on how many people decide to file bugs > against already released packages"
You statement is true for unstable (=current), but not experimental as outlined in http://wiki.opencsw.org/automated-release-process Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
