Hi Phil, Am 13.12.2010 um 18:52 schrieb Philip Brown: > On 12/13/10, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 13.12.2010 um 11:40 schrieb [email protected]: >>> I filed a bug against amavisd_new >>> (https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4629) but I think the problem >>> is that pm_berkeleydb requires updating for CSWbdb48 4.8.30. >> >> Ugh, I wasn't aware that the *specific* bdb version is used instead of 4.8.x >> This is very bad. It may require rebuilding everything depending on 4.8: >> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/berkeleydb48/ >> > > This is exactly why I have been against having a lot of different > versions of berkeleydb in our active catalog. It makes our lives > messier. > Certain programs, once compiled with a specific version of it, want to > *stick* with a specific version of it. So the fewer versions we have > of berkeleydb, the better for us. > > On the brighter side, reading the bug report... it sounds like the > amavisd checker is being overly .. picky. > What does it care, about which .h file is installed?
It does not. The perl module has it compiled in and possible every program using it could be misguarded - and I won't repatch the perl module. To make it as good as possible we just respin the packages and hopefully be done with it and remind next time to first rebuild bdb-world. Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
