On 12/14/10, Sebastian Kayser <[email protected]> wrote: > ... >> I like option 3 but I don't use sieve. However, sieve should work just >> fine this way. > > Actually, I don't see a reason - besides the aforementioned hack - for > the existance of a separate sieve (no additional deps e.g.). Should be > fine to deprecate dovecot_sieve. >
Is "Sieve" usable, without deploying dovecot?I vaguely recall that might have been the reason why it was split out. Hm. it depends on CSWdovecot, so I would guess not. Although I dont see any shared-lib deps that would require it? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
