No dia 21 de Dezembro de 2010 08:23, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> escreveu: > Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: >>> "I think it gets harder when you don't have a tuple of integers. For >>> instance, OpenSSL uses letters in their normal versions -- 0.9.8j, for >>> instance, which we translated to 0.9.8.10. [....]" >> >> Umh, this is pretty bad. I suggest using instead >> a.b.c_def,REV=x.y.z >> a version of z.y.x.a.b.c and hide def somewhere. > > it wasn't in the REV string that we "hide" def? such as > a.b.c,REV=def,x.y.z, in the case of openssl 0.9.8,REV=j
In the past, we had: 1.2.3,REV=YYYY.MM.DD_rev=foo There are some unit tests with version strings that checkpkg has to handle: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/gar/v2/lib/python/opencsw_test.py#L197 _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
