No dia 28 de Dezembro de 2010 20:53, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> escreveu: >> Working yesterday on this kind of stuff I remarked that the majority of >> our development packages follow this convention and use _devel suffix >> (116 of 117 explicitly identified as development packages). So it's too >> late to use the _dev suffix without changing a lot of packages >> name, even though I would preferred _dev as its shorter, deliver enough >> information and its homogeneous with other distributions. > > Right, I was more focussing on the package name, where the old "standard" > was sort of CSWfoodevel, but IMHO should be changed to be CSWfoo-devel. > Nonetheless the shorter and more standard -dev would be even better. > More opinions?
I'd vote for the shorter one, -dev. The remaining "el" doesn't convey any new information, except for being a tiny bit prettier. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
