No dia 31 de Dezembro de 2010 19:59, Ben Walton <[email protected]> escreveu: > Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Wed Dec 29 21:52:33 > -0500 2010: > > Hi Maciej, > >> The 'none' class creates the missing files automatically, and we have >> a large number of files that are missing base directories. > > I like the intent, but I'm not sure I like the result. Wouldn't it be > better to simply tell the maintainer to ensure the package provides > this directory instead of potentially suggesting that the package > depend on other random looking (although definitely not random) > packages that do?
This is a good point. The only worry is that the created directory might conflict with other existing directories. This problem is not specific to this issue, I just would like checkpkg to give a sane suggestion that does not result in one package creating the directory as root:bin and another as, say, root:lp. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
