Ben Walton <[email protected]> writes: > Excerpts from Peter FELECAN's message of Fri Dec 31 06:20:24 -0500 2010: > >> IMO, LaTeX is less about backslashes than document format and good >> typography. Other than using macros you don't need a lot of special >> characters... > > We converted our documentation at work from texinfo to docbook as > people didn't like the idiosyncrasies of texinfo (not strictly LaTex, > of course). Emacs makes editting the xml easy as it does most of the > work and I'm sure vim offers similar functionality. > > I'd vote for docbook or asciidoc. (I won't argue that LaTex produces > nicer output though. :))
Docbook or even html as proposed by Phil is still SGML. Even with the highly configurable Emacs it's a real PITA. Consequently, my vote goes for asciidoc. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
