do you envision a simple and easy to upgrade package by everyone, or we end up with a "php-style package" nobody is able to maintain any more?
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:07, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Sun Jan 02 10:46:59 > -0500 2011: > >> I agree that it's a good idea and I would like the mysql packages to >> be packaged that way. In this proposal, I would like to decouple >> the packaging from shared libraries from the rest of mysql packages. >> I would like the mysql shared library packages to stop being special >> and different from all other shared library packages. > > If this is a short term step as part of a larger plan to consolidate > the entire package back under the 'normal' prefix, that's good. Don't > you think it's potentially more inconvenient (to you and the users) to > do this piecemeal though? > >> It's the divide and conquer idea - it's easier to tackle one problem >> at a time. I would like to deal with shared libraries first, and >> when this bit is done, continue with --prefix=/opt/csw. > > Ok. > > Thanks > -Ben > -- > Ben Walton > Systems Programmer - CHASS > University of Toronto > C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. > _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
