"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes: > Let's sum it up. If I understand correctly, permission to depend on > openslp has not been granted. Instead, we can declare a dependency on > SUNWslpu. It will not result in automatic installation of libslp, but > will display a message during package installation, that SUNWslpu is > missing. The 64-bit libslp is in differently named packages between > Solaris 9 and 10, which could be potentially be a showstopper. > However, in the case of cups, because (by coincidence) there are no > 64-bit cups libraries, we don't need to declare a dependency providing > the 64-bit libslp. Therefore, we'll declare a dependency on SUNWslpu > until 64-bit cups libraries come along. We'll revisit the issue then. > > Is that the result of our discussion?
Not really. There were 4 people (you, Ben, Peter Bonivart and myself) agreeing with a Open CSW package for openslp. Phil is against. My interpretation is exactly the reverse of your summary. Anyhow, if you changed your mind I don't have a thing to say. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
