Hi Phil, Am 18.01.2011 um 19:05 schrieb Philip Brown: > On 1/18/11, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Am 07.01.2011 um 16:34 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: >>> Am 07.01.2011 um 16:28 schrieb Philip Brown: >>>> Errrr.... Almost all of the listed packages, are missing from newpkgs. >>> >>> Strange, pushed again. >> >> "yaz" has still not been released. I repushed again. Please verify >> that it reaches the mirrors. > > Sorry, I had set yaz aside, and forgotten about it. I THOUGHT I had > emailed the list, but dont see it. maybe I forgot to send :-( > > There's a whole bunch of incorrect references to /usr/local in the > manpages, etc. > I think these are not trivial examples, but "this is where you > configure yaz" type docs. > How about cleaning them up?
Phil, your constant nagging about documentation is a real PITA. Fixing these takes an amount of time (probably on every release) which has no resemblance to the main package. We have A TON of really outdated, not packaged PRIO-1 stuff. Do you really think we should focus on documentation instead of having e.g. an updated Kerberos or PHP? Fixing doc issues in all packages takes a regular amount of time in terms of *hours* I don't have for version bumps. For a 100% package we should fix it, right. But we are not at 99%. Or 95%. Or even 90%. We are more at 75%. Focusing on docs is IMHO the wrong priority. Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
