* Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/2/9 Maciej Blizi??ski <[email protected]>: > > 2011/2/9 Philip Brown <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Most of our policies are already written up. You make it sound like we > >> are facing a choice of either writing hundreds of pages ourselves, or > >> copying wholesale from debian. > >> This is a false choice. Most of the policies we need, we already have > >> written up. > > > > Please point me at our abstract and copyright notice. > > > > I did say "most", not "all". > > But since you bring those things up: > Do we really *need* a copyright notice? Why? Are we deathly afraid > someone is going to "steal" our policies, and.... what, exactly?
Is there any harm in having a license? No. So please focus on the relevant parts. > I'm also not sure what is the huge need for "an abstract". or even if > there is, why this is so difficult to do ourselves quickly and easily. > Going by > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ > their "abstract" consists of two lines, which basically say, "This is > the policy manual. Stuff in debian, needs to follow debian policy.". If you guys start to discuss whether the _abstract_ (i.e. not even actual policies) needs to be 2 or 5 lines long I feel that the policy team isn't off to a good start. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
