On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: >> It works with the latest GAR, probably Maciej was right that Phil >> used an old GAR. Nonetheless I recommend using CATALOGNAME_* >> explicitly to avoid any confusion. > > Yes, I missed this in the output. I've made this explicit in r13253.
This probably started with me skipping both PACKAGES and CATALOGNAME since they were exactly the same as the source for my initial version. /peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
