Hi Phil, Am 08.03.2011 um 22:16 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Am 08.03.2011 um 21:51 schrieb Philip Brown: >> >>> >>> well that's a good thing, but there there a specific reason why it is >>> NOT linked, from pkg.opencsw.org? >> >> Because the reports are specific to what is on the buildfarm. >> The natural entry point is the buildfarm, so thats why it is >> linked from there... >> > > So, you are saying that > http://pkg.opencsw.org/pkgbrowser/reports/ > > is only relevant to "things in experimental, on buildfarm"?
At this time, yes. > If so, then wouldnt it make sense to "move" it to be > pkgbrowser > > ? > (and then make links at the top level , http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/ , for > it?) No, because the longterm idea is to have a general package browser to dive into every package. But as we don't have this neatly ATM it is implemented as experimental feature for maintainers only on buildfarm. Does that make sense? Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
