Why do we allow blastwave addresses to sign up? It isn't the first time Dennis has popped up from lurking the list.
/peter ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dennis Clarke <[email protected]> Date: Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:08 PM Subject: Re: [csw-users] SunFreeware vs. Blastwave To: Questions and discussions <[email protected]> > FYI to Larry Siden: > I'm not sure where you got the idea that blastwave supports signed > packages whereas opencsw does not. > (or perhaps, you were only commenting on blastwave vs sunfreeware? At > any rate...) > As far as I know, blastwave still uses the same signing mechanisms > that I wrote, before the OpenCSW split-off. > > So, both blastwave and opencsw still use gpg for package integrity in > the same way I think. Everything written by you was thrown away the next day after you stole away in the middle of the night with *everything* you could copy, carry or steal, that includes the Blastwave GPG key. Everything was re-written from scratch after that and no one here will touch anything that bears your name. Ever. -- Dennis Clarke [email protected] <- Email related to the open source Solaris [email protected] <- Email related to open source for Solaris _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
