Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Sat Apr 23 20:21:28 -0400 2011: > Not exactly. James requested a "standard" label. I requested > suggestions for a "standard" that is more relevant to us.
Well, I think the standard (/ vs - aside) that James proposed is perfectly adequate. # CreationDate: 2011-04-21T20:10:46Z Perfect. Concise, easy to parse, conveys all necessary information. > But meanwhile, a creation timestamp HAS been added to the catalog, if > you notice. Yes, I mentioned that I saw 'blah blah date' (too much verbiage, imo). > FYI, as someone pointed out, the format that James requested, is not > compliant with the relevant ISO. Because of '/' instead of '-'. Ok, so lets s/\//-/g and go with that. I'd then propose that: # SITEFEATURES gzippedcatalog becomes # SiteFeatures: gzippedcatalog So that it is consistent with CreationDate. We could then move forwarding with the following format for any future additions to catalog metadata: # CamelCaseLabel: value Work for everyone? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
