hi dago, do you think the neon 0.26.x line could be removed now?
rupert On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 09:45, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rupert, > > Am 05.12.2010 um 00:05 schrieb rupert THURNER: > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 23:32, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Am 04.12.2010 um 21:39 schrieb rupert THURNER: > >>> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWneon/ shows that old versions of > neon are linked. > >> > >> It looks perfectly good to me. You are aware that 0.29.x contains > .so.27, are you? > > > > yes, but it should not link to it any more in a new release. > > It should. libneon.so.27 is *the* shared library from neon 0.29.x., > it is not old. There is no resemblance between so-numbers and > releases-numbers, essentially you have to compile a package and > look what is produced to find out about the so-numbers. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. >
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
