On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this all sound reasonable? > > If this is the case, we should likely have gcc4 rebuilt with different > flags so that it's base is v8. >
yes that sounds like what happened... however.... we should also make it so that the library actually uses the extra functionality on v9. atomic-add is pretty important for good performance. we can't NOT support it, on the better cpus. reminder: this can be done with AUX_FILTERs, perhaps. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
