Hi Ben, (moving to maintainers@)
Am 17.05.2011 um 18:47 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue May 17 12:40:46 -0400 2011: > >> yes, see http://www.opencsw.org/packages/puppet/ >> >> Since people can still trim off the @UNCOMMITTED and get something >> useful, I deemed it non-fatal. > > I agree it's non-fatal, I was just clarifying. I think it should be fatal: not because the error is that big, but because 1) it can result in privately build, non-repeatable package builds 2) it breaks browsing of the repository 3) it is really easy to fix >> Reguardless of what triggered it, I think that the mgar [re]package >> code, should refuse to continue if it attempts to package something >> with OPENCSW_REPOSITORY=.*UNCOMMITTED > > Actually, this should be a check added to checkpkg. The [re]package > target in mgar shouldn't care about this. I thought submitpkg already had a trigger in it refusing to submit uncommitted packages? Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
