On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Mon May 30 16:08:35 -0400 2011: > > Hi Rupert, > >> You could separate out svnserve and other repository administration >> *binaries* (svnadmin, svnlook, svndumpfilter) into a separate >> package. > > This sounds like a good idea. I've seen a few bug requests for it. > >> With the svn libraries it's a different story. You will want all of >> them on both the client and server. This means you'll need most (and >> probably all) dependencies on both sides. > > This would be a good subversion-common package. Both the server and > client packages could then depend on it
we have a tradition of "common" usually being non-binary. Prossibly "utils" is better for the executables. and the usual lib stuff, for libraries? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
