On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Phil: I've modified the vote writeup such that it's talking about the > proposal as written. Please fill out the cons side. If Jonathan does > put forward an ammendment that's accepted, you can update as necessary > before the vote if started.
Ben: So, to be clear: you are rejecting every single one of my wording amendments? Even though some of them clearly point out that the proposal claims things that are false? Jonathan made *comments* about my proposed amendments 2,3,4&5 However, I dont see that he refuted what I was saying. For example, on #3, he did comment on my complaint about the "set in stone" bit, but did not argue with my statement that the release manager cannot currently "reject" a package. Therefore, the "reject" part should be taken out of the proposal, because it is undisputedly false. It would be nice if you reviewed his comments on 2,4 & 5 more carefully also. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
