On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 17:38, Jonathan Craig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:12 AM, rupert THURNER <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > if you want to have a fair result even if you have similar possibilities > in > > the selection, one might consider the debian method of > > voting, > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloneproof_Schwartz_Sequential_Dropping. > > otherwise opencsw will be called thunderbay, not lakehead :) > > rupert. > > That is an elegant solution when choosing amongst a group of like > items. If we were determining the color of our logo I would be all > for it. The major issue would be timely implementation. We use > Ballotbin to hold our elections as its controlled by a third party and > is therefore subject to less concern of rigging. A quick look at the > software list referenced in the wikipedia site didn't immediately turn > up a third party with the same capability. maybe http://modernballots.com/ would be an option ... i tried to create a test vote http://modernballots.com/_l3FJ7qj rupert.
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
