Em 06/07/2011 16:25, "Dagobert Michelsen" <[email protected]> escreveu: > > Hi, > > Am 05.07.2011 um 21:05 schrieb Ben Walton: > > Excerpts from Peter Bonivart's message of Tue Jul 05 14:13:08 -0400 2011: > >>> Darn... I looked in i386. This raises the question of the 2 testing > >>> platforms: are they identical? Me think that no. > >> > >> You're right: > > > > These boxes aren't really "maintained" as much as the current and > > unstable hosts. They're basically: > > > > I need this, so I install it. That doesn't get applied evenly. The > > nature of their use doesn't lend itself to applying updates across the > > board either, although we could definitely improve that. > > I suggest leave it that way for testing* and set up a new set of machines > for project specific work, like project* similar to what we have.
Checkpkg derives the catalog name (e.g.current or unstable) from the host name. It will be necessary to set CATALOG_NAME in system wide garrc.
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
