Maciej Bliziński <[email protected]> writes: > Em 20/07/2011 19:12, "Ben Walton" <[email protected]> escreveu: >> >> Excerpts from Peter FELECAN's message of Wed Jul 20 14:09:21 -0400 2011: >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> > > The code is in a git repository: >> > > [email protected]:cswsign.git >> > >> > However, can we use one and only one source control system? It starts to >> > be a little bit of a bazaar (and I'm not proposing bzr) >> >> I will place it in the opencsw sourceforge repository beside the >> buildfarm code, etc then. I agree that until we switch, mixing isn't >> ideal. I'll still develop with git but will push to svn for public >> consumption. > > Can we use github (or code.google.com) for development in git and > periodically sync the code with subversion?
Please use *one* official SCM and, if you wish, make a bridge toward others. In what you describe, github is the principal one and subversion a bridged one. What I propose is the contrary until we decide on changing the official SCM. A final point is to use the same SCM for all the public OpenCSW projects. -- Peter FELECAN mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
